Ok, when I did my second sensitivity shoot-out, I also did different white balance settings. I use some of my sensitivity shoot-out pictures here as well to demonstrate the effect of white balance. If you wonder what white balance does or why it is necessary: The reason is that as soon as the scene is lighted by a light source with a spectrum different from the sun, the colours are different from what we expect. Our eye sends these wrong colours to our brain. Our brain is able to do some sort of white balance. But it is by no means perfect. Have you ever bought a shirt in a store with mainly artyificial light, went out of the shop and realized that it looks terrible? Then, your brain was not able to do a 100% white balance. It is similar with digital cameras. Actually, the automatic white balance algorithms are fairly sophisticated and some manufacturers are better than others in implementing them. I noticed that the custom white balance of the 2040 is awesome! It really has a huuuge adjustment range. In fact, it is able to make the strong red cast disappear completely. It is even possible to turn it into a green cast when balancing on a reddish surface. This is probably not useful, but it shows the excellence of the Olympus' feature. The Minolta D7, however advanced she is, has a very weak custom white balance. The latitude of the settings is really only able to correct the relatively weak cast that comes from artificial light sources. For more info on light sources and their effect on white balance you should visit micro.magnet.fsu.edu/optics/lightandcolor/sources.html. A very excellent source, describing the spectrum emitted by different light sources. You can see that Tungsten lamps are mostly red. This is pretty similar to what a camera sees through a mild IR filter like the Heliopan 715nm I currently use. I guess this is the reason why the Tungsten white balance gives nice pictures. After my shootings, I had the feeling, that whitebalance influences sensitivity. Could this really be? Zayla has written a very interesting message in this thread over at dpreview. Zayla noticed that the camera tends to end exposure when one channel clips. When using a IR pass filter, this is commonly the red channel. Thus, you would obtain a picture with nearly no info in the green and blue channels. There are two ways to remedy this: a) shoot in B&W b) use custom white balance. B&W works, as it is basically the average of the R, G, B channels for any given pixel. Custom white balance works because the individual amplification of each channel is adjusted in a way that prevents one channel from clipping way before the other. I'd suggest shooting colour = custom white balance. But if your camera does not offer it, make sure you give B&W a try. However, please note that both methods will decrease apparent sensitivity: The IR-sensitive red channel is now less important and the light that was once collected by the red sensor elements must now be provided be the insensitive blue and green ones. I will surely have to produce some evidence in form of images, but until then you might want to keep it in mind. Update: Have a look at my Nikon 5100 sensitivity page for more on the effect of WB with IR. | |
Camera: Olympus 2020 Filter: none Exposure time: 1/400 F-stop: 7.0 ISO speed: 100 Focal length: 8.0000 White balance: Automatic aEV: 14.2586 comments: good rendition of scene |
|
Camera: Olympus 2020 Filter: Heliopan 715nm IR pass filter Exposure time: 1/60 F-stop: 2.0 ISO speed: 100 Focal length: 8.0000 White Balance: Automatic aEV: 7.9069 comments: very nice colours |
|
Camera: Olympus 2020 Filter: Heliopan 715nm IR pass filter Exposure time: 1/60 F-stop: 2.0 ISO speed: 100 Focal length: 8.0000 White balance: Tungsten aEV: 7.9069 comments: purple cast |
|
Camera: Olympus 2020 Filter: Heliopan 715nm IR pass filter Exposure time: 1/80 F-stop: 2.0 ISO speed: 100 Focal length: 8.0000 White balance: Fluorescent aEV: 8.3219 comments: pinkish-red cast |
|
Camera: Olympus 2020 Filter: Heliopan 715nm IR pass filter Exposure time: 1/60 F-stop: 2.0 ISO speed: 100 Focal length: 8.0000 White balance: Daylight aEV: 7.9069 comments: red cast |
|
Camera: Olympus 2020 Filter: Heliopan 715nm IR pass filter Exposure time: 1/60 F-stop: 2.0 ISO speed: 100 Focal length: 8.0000 White balance: D55 aEV: 7.9069 comments: looks very much like "daylight" |
|
Without IR cut-filter! | |
Camera: Olympus 2040IR Filter: none Exposure time: 1/500 F-stop: 10.0 ISO speed: 100 Focal length: 8.1000 White balance: Automatic aEV: 15.6096 comments: strong red cast in visible light due to removal of cyan-coloured IR cut-filter |
|
Camera: Olympus 2040IR Filter: none Exposure time: 1/650 F-stop: 8.0 ISO speed: 100 Focal length: 8.1000 White balance: Custom aEV: 15.3443 comments: Wow! Looks pretty nice. Visible light photography is obviously possible with the 2040IR. |
|
Camera: Olympus 2040IR Filter: Heliopan 715nm IR pass filter Exposure time: 1/650 F-stop: 4.5 ISO speed: 100 Focal length: 8.1000 White balance: Custom, taken from the last shot (balanced without IR pass filter) aEV: 13.6841 comments: Interesting! Mild red cast with the custom white balance I did without the IR pass filter. |
|
Camera: Olympus 2040IR Filter: Heliopan 715nm IR pass filter Exposure time: 1/500 F-stop: 4.5 ISO speed: 100 Focal length: 8.1000 White balance: Automatic aEV: 13.3056 comments: Strong reddish cast, just like when using automatic WB without a filter. |
|
Camera: Olympus 2040IR Filter: Heliopan 715nm IR pass filter Exposure time: 1/650 F-stop: 4.0 ISO speed: 100 Focal length: 8.1000 White balance: Custom aEV: 13.3443 comments: Very nice almost greyscale colours with custom white balance set with the IR pass filter on |
|
Camera: Olympus 2040IR Filter: Heliopan 715nm IR pass filter Exposure time: 1/650 F-stop: 4.0 ISO speed: 100 Focal length: 8.1000 White balance: D55 aEV: 13.3443 comments: strong red cast |
|
Camera: Olympus 2040IR Filter: Heliopan 715nm IR pass filter Exposure time: 1/650 F-stop: 4.0 ISO speed: 100 Focal length: 8.1000 White balance: Daylight aEV: 13.3443 comments: seems a bit less saturated than D55 |
|
Camera: Olympus 2040IR Filter: Heliopan 715nm IR pass filter Exposure time: 1/500 F-stop: 4.5 ISO speed: 100 Focal length: 8.1000 White balance: Fluorescent aEV: 13.3056 comments: red with a little bit of purple |
|
Camera: Olympus 2040IR Filter: Heliopan 715nm IR pass filter Exposure time: 1/500 F-stop: 4.5 ISO speed: 100 Focal length: 8.1000 White balance: Tungsten aEV: 13.3056 comments: strong magenta cast |
|
Camera: Minolta D7 Filter: none Exposure time: 1/500 F-stop: 8.0 ISO speed: 100 Focal length: 10.2109 White balance: Automatic aEV: 14.9658 comments: pretty nice colours |
|
Camera: Minolta D7 Filter: Heliopan 715nm IR pass filter Exposure time: 1/45 F-stop: 2.8 ISO speed: 200 Focal length: 10.2109 White balance: Automatic aEV: 7.4627 comments: strong orange cast |
|
Camera: Minolta D7 Filter: Heliopan 715nm IR pass filter Exposure time: 1/45 F-stop: 2.8 ISO speed: 160 Focal length: 10.2109 White balance: Daylight aEV: 7.7846 comments: seems exactly like automatic WB |
|
Camera: Minolta D7 Filter: Heliopan 715nm IR pass filter Exposure time: 1/45 F-stop: 2.8 ISO speed: 160 Focal length: 10.2109 White balance: Fluorescent aEV: 7.7846 comments: Strangely I cannot see any difference to "Daylight" |
|
Camera: Minolta D7 Filter: Heliopan 715nm IR pass filter Exposure time: 1/45 F-stop: 2.8 ISO speed: 200 Focal length: 10.2109 White balance: Tungsten aEV: 7.4627 comments: pretty beautiful orange-brownish cast |
|
Camera: Minolta D7 Filter: Heliopan 715nm IR pass filter Exposure time: 1/45 F-stop: 2.8 ISO speed: 160 Focal length: 10.2109 White balance: WB10 aEV: 7.7846 comments: Once again, almost no difference to the daylight and fluorescent settings |
|
I did not do the full list of WBs this time. I just picked out some. | |
Minolta D7IR (without internal IR cut-filter) As expected, automatic white balance gives a strong red cast |
|
Minolta D7IR (without internal IR cut-filter) With Tungsten, it looks a little bit like an Olympus 2020, don't you think? |
|
Minolta D7IR (without internal IR cut-filter) This was shot with manual white balance through the IR pass-filter. Interestingly, the White Balance of the D7IR can cope at least partly with the red colour cast. On the D7 it just refuses to work at all. |
|
Minolta D7IR (without internal IR cut-filter) This was shot with manual white balance without the filter. After balancing on a white surface, the filter was mounted. |
|
Minolta D7IR (without internal IR cut-filter) Ok, not exactly white balance, this shot was taken in B&W mode. Can you see the hotspot? It becomes very hard to see in black'n'white. Sorry, I do not remember who told me that hint! |
|
Conclusion: The 2020 is easily usable for IR photography with fully automatic settings. My 2040IR is a bit more difficult to use. However, the custom white balance is easily done and gives good results in visible light with extremely short shutter speeds and awesome results in IR photography and therefore wins my personal recommendation despite its focus problems. The Minolta D7 however is quite disappointing in IR light when used without post-processing. Of course, it is the best camera of the three for visible light but has the slowest lens. It is interesting that the white balance function of the modified D7IR gives so different results. Although it is still inferior to that of the 2040IR, it's actually useful. |